Skip to main content

In re J.C.

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 3070

Syllabus

EVIDENCE – SUFFICIENCY – RESISTING ARREST: Where the officer could not testify as to the details of the conversation which formed the basis of his probable cause determination, there was insufficient evidence that the juvenile was lawfully arrested for resisting arrest and aggravated menacing. [But see DISSENT: Where the juvenile court magistrate terminated the juvenile's case prior to disposition and the juvenile court adopted the magistrate's decision terminating the case and remitted costs, the juvenile never received a disposition on her delinquency adjudication for resisting arrest, and therefore, the appellate court has no jurisdiction over the juvenile's appeal and it should be dismissed.]

Judges: Kinsley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.