In re J.B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioner could maintain his action seeking “parental rights and responsibilities under RSA chapter 461-A,” notwithstanding his lack of biological relationship to the child, “so long as he alleges sufficient facts to establish his status as a parent by other means”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Matter of Marcus J. Hampers and Kristin C. Hampers
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2014-06-24· cited 19×
• Burke v. Pierro
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-12-16· cited 8×
• In re Guardianship of Madelyn B.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2014-07-02· cited 8×
• In the Matter of Richell Chrestensen and Sean Pearson
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2019-03-08

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Watts v. Watts
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1975-04-30· cited 32×
• In re Nelson
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-06-06· cited 23×
• Grand China, Inc. v. United National Insurance
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-11-09· cited 20×
• Matter of Gendron
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2008-05-20· cited 15×
• McRae v. McRae
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1975-06-30· cited 14×
• Tosta v. Bullis
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2008-02-26· cited 13×
• In re Haller
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-12-30· cited 7×
• Appeal of Regenesis Corp.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-11-30· cited 7×