In Re JB

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding subsection 7B-911(c)(2)(a) was not satisfied since “the court did not find that there was no longer a need for continued State intervention on behalf of [the juvenile].”
• holding the trial court improperly terminated its jurisdiction over a juvenile case due in part to the court’s failure to “find that there was no longer a need for continued State intervention on behalf of [the juvenile] in accordance with [N.C. Gen. Stat. §] 7B- 911(c)(2)(a)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• In re: A.J.J.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2025-07-02

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Ledbetter
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2003-06-03· cited 12×
• In Re KL
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2009-04-07· cited 7×