In Re Jason Ryan Molinar v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting obvious improvidence requires the stevedore to “use an object with a defective condition that is so hazardous that anyone can tell that its continued use creates an unreasonable risk of harm even when the stevedore’s expertise is taken into account”
• courts have “excused technical noncompliance [with Rule 50(b)] where the purposes of the requirement have been satisfied”
• shipowners are deemed to have actual knowledge of dangerous conditions if condition existed from the outset [of the job]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).