California Court of Appeal· 7/25/2007
In Re Jasmine S.
Citations
- 63 Cal. Rptr. 3d 593
- 153 Cal. App. 4th 835
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that in dependency proceedings attorney representing multiple siblings will be disqualified \only if the circumstances present an actual conflict-a mere potential conflict is insufficient to warrant disqualification\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mosk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kirk v. First American Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-04-07· cited 44×
- Sharp v. Next Entertainment Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2008-05-28· cited 32×
- In Re Zamer G.California Court of Appeal· 2007-07-31· cited 28×
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. S. B.California Court of Appeal· 2007-07-31· cited 2×
- Musaelian v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court· 2007-10-10· cited 1×
- Walker v. Apple, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2016-10-28
- Doe v. YimCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2020-10-06
- Lopez v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-07-20
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Celine R.California Supreme Court· 2003-07-07· cited 665×
- In Re Zeth S.California Supreme Court· 2003-08-04· cited 665×
- People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1999-07-27· cited 360×
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-09-21· cited 316×
- Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-08-24· cited 310×
- Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-12-28· cited 248×
- Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. San Francisco Airports CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-08-16· cited 160×
- People v. ContrerasCalifornia Supreme Court· 2013-12-12· cited 143×
- Carsten v. Psychology Examining CommitteeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-08-07· cited 120×
- City & County of San Francisco v. Cobra Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2006-06-05· cited 110×
- Gregori v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-01-20· cited 107×
- SYNGENTA CORP PROTECTION, INC. v. HellikerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-04-25· cited 57×
- Holmes v. California National GuardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-06-29· cited 56×
- DCH Health Services Corp. v. WaiteCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-01-28· cited 55×
- Crook v. ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-02-04· cited 41×
- In Re Barbara R.California Court of Appeal· 2006-03-20· cited 34×
- Castro v. Los Angeles County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-08-02· cited 28×
- People v. ChristianCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-01-09· cited 24×
- Hetos Investments, Ltd. v. KurtinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-06-30· cited 23×
- Bratcher v. BucknerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-07-24· cited 21×
Other cases named In Re Jasmine S.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.