In Re Jarvis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that contingency fee agreement in action to increase spousal maintenance was void
• holding that contingency fee agreement in action to increase spousal maintenance was void

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Alexander v. Inman
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1995-02-08· cited 76×
• Marquis & Aurbach v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of Clark
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2006-11-30· cited 35×
• In re Alberg
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-02-22· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dannenberg v. Dannenberg
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1940-04-06· cited 13×
• Meyers v. Handlon
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1985-06-20· cited 7×