In Re James F.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• constitutional error in dependency and neglect case is not structural; harmless error analysis applies
• ‘‘[w]e cannot agree . . . that prejudice is irrel- evant in a dependency proceeding when the welfare of the child is at issue and delay in resolution of the proceeding is inherently prejudicial to the child’’
• ‘[w]e can- not agree . . . that prejudice is irrelevant in a depen- dency proceeding when the welfare of the child is at issue and delay in resolution of the proceeding is inher- ently prejudicial to the child’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).