In Re: James E. White, IV, Individually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust Marti White Wright, Individually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust And Clinton Wesley White, Indvidually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust, by and Through His Next-Friend, James E. White, IV v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district courts are not entitled to deference on review of determinations of state law
• holding that “a court of appeals should review de novo a district court’s determination of state law”
• holding that “a court of appeals should review de novo a district court’s determination of state law”
• holding that a court of appeals should review a district court’s determination of state law de novo
• holding that district courts’ interpretation of state law is owed no deference on review
• holding that, on appeal from a bench trial, this court reviews the district court’s conclusions of law de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).