Supreme Court of North Carolina· 9/25/2020
In re J.A.M.
Syllabus
Termination of parental rights no-merit brief pro se arguments district court judge's recusal not required based solely on her entry of prior orders designating adoption as child's permanent plan.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re E.H.P.Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2019-08-16· cited 217×
- In re P.L.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2005-09-06· cited 111×
- In re L.E.M.Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2019-08-16· cited 101×
- In re T.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2006-12-19· cited 91×
- In re J.A.M.Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2019-02-01· cited 75×
- In re M.A.I.B.K.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2007-06-19· cited 16×
- In re: J.A.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-12-20· cited 7×
- In re: J.A.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-06-05· cited 6×
- In re J.A.M.Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-03-02· cited 5×
- In re J.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-04-17· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.