in Re Jajuga Estate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the use of “entitled” in the statute applicable to that case denoted a party’s legal right to something
• noting, “[c]ases from other jurisdictions, although not binding, may be persuasive”
• noting, “[c]ases from other jurisdictions, although not binding, may be persuasive”
• “ ‘Generally, when language is included in one section of a statute but omitted from another section, it is presumed that the drafters acted intentionally and purposely in their inclusion or exclusion.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).