In re J.A.G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where subsequent to a period of aftercare treatment, the court ordered respondent placed in a new residential program as the third phase of respondent’s treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re D.H.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-09-29· cited 23×
• In Re C.S.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-08-01· cited 22×
• In re A.A.I.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-11-14· cited 10×
• In Re Myrick
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-05-20· cited 6×
• In re P.S.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-04-24· cited 5×
• Tyson Farms v. Uninsured Emp. Fund.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-11-20· cited 5×
• In Re PS
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-04-24
• Matter of JAG
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-03-08
• In Re DH
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-09-29
• Matter of AAI
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-11-14

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Roe v. Wade
  Supreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 5,581×
• Kent v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1966-03-22· cited 2,202×
• M. A. P. v. Ryan
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1971-12-29· cited 973×
• Enoch Creek, Jr. v. William J. Stone
  D.C. Circuit· 1967-05-01· cited 58×
• In re C. I. T.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-02-16· cited 34×
• In the Matter of Jesse Gene Elmore
  D.C. Circuit· 1967-05-23· cited 31×
• In Re LEM
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1960-10-14· cited 28×
• In re J. M. W.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-01-10· cited 23×
• In re an Inquiry into Allegations of Misconduct Against Juveniles Detained at & Committed at Cedar Knoll Institution
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-05-12· cited 21×
• In re J. J.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-05-28· cited 16×