In re Jadaquis B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, absent extenuating circumstances, because vaccinations are now available to federal inmates, the COVID-19 pandemic is not considered “extraordinary and compelling”
• suggesting that Owens is not good law and expressing skepticism that “unrelated factors, each individually insufficient to justify a sentence reduction, [can] amount to more than the sum of their individual parts”
• “[A] non-retroactive judicial decision cannot support a finding of extraordinary and compelling circumstances whether ‘offered alone or combined with other personal factors.’” (citation omitted)
• “[W]hy would combining unrelated factors, each individually insufficient to justify a sentence reduction, amount to more than the sum of their individual parts?”
• “Havis does not apply retroactively.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).