Skip to main content
· 2/25/1994

In Re Jack Raley Construction, Inc.

Citations

  • 17 F.3d 291
  • 28 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 33
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 2481
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1398
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding appellants had no reasonable belief that notice of appeal was effective especially where they requested permission to brief and argue remaining issue
  • “The premature notice here was not valid because the matter of pre-judgment interest was not decided until October, long after the notice of appeal had been filed.”
  • “Where there is some doubt about the application of [the notice of appeal rules and FRAP 4(a)(2)], the prudent course of action is merely to file a fresh appeal after entry of final judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.