· 2/25/1994
In Re Jack Raley Construction, Inc.
Citations
- 17 F.3d 291
- 28 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 33
- 94 Daily Journal DAR 2481
- 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1398
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 3262
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding appellants had no reasonable belief that notice of appeal was effective especially where they requested permission to brief and argue remaining issue
- “The premature notice here was not valid because the matter of pre-judgment interest was not decided until October, long after the notice of appeal had been filed.”
- “Where there is some doubt about the application of [the notice of appeal rules and FRAP 4(a)(2)], the prudent course of action is merely to file a fresh appeal after entry of final judgment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.