In Re Jack Kline Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that oversecured creditors have obligation to make separate application for interest under § 506(b) and that reference in proof of claim is not sufficient
• concluding that the creditor’s failure to seek post-petition interest at the default rate under § 506(b
• holding that proof of claim should not be reconsidered because objecting party had not established that claim was inappropriate or fraudulent
• finding a differential of 12.75 to 13.75 percent “significantly large” to be inequitable and unreasonable
• oversecured creditors have the ultimate burden of showing they are entitled to pospetition fees
• oversecured creditors have the ultimate burden of showing they are entitled to pospetition fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).