Skip to main content
· 5/8/1985

In Re Jack E. Caveney and Roy A. Moody

Citations

  • 761 F.2d 671
  • 226 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 1
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 14789

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The mere fact that a product is delivered to a distributor does not exempt the transaction from 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).”
  • “An exception to [the on-sale bar] exists where a patented method is kept secret and remains secret after a sale of the unpatented product of the method.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Markey, Miller, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.