In re J.A., M.A.-1, L.A., and S.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Board is entitled to deference because it is \expert in federal national labor relations policy\
• noting that the fact that hospital had previously allowed union solicitation “apparently without untoward effects,” supported the Board’s determination that solicitation would not disturb patients
• stating that the Board is entitled to deference because it is \expert in federal national labor relations policy\
• stating that the Board is entitled to deference because it is' “expert in federal national labor relations policy”
• stating that the Board is entitled to deference because it is “expert in federal national labor relations policy”
• noting that it is the Board's role to formulate \rules [that] str[ike] the appropriate balance between organizational and employer rights in the particular industry to which each is applicable\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).