In re J. S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interested parties must be afforded fair opportunity to examine, criticize and refute findings of social report admitted to support finding of nonamenability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• T.C. v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1987-07-13· cited 15×
• TC v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1987-07-13· cited 1×
• In re the Appeal in Maricopa County
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-03-23· cited 1×
• Matter of JS
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1976-11-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kent v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1966-03-22· cited 2,202×
• J. T. P v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1975-12-30· cited 102×
• Calhoon v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1976-04-13· cited 38×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1974-07-25· cited 23×
• Kern v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1974-05-13· cited 13×
• State v. Wofford
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1976-05-07· cited 12×