In Re Izzi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that indebtedness arising from “tort liability” is not a consumer debt
• “There is no evidence that the [Court of Common Pleas] in any way attempted to, or did, ‘construe’ the bankruptcy stay.”
• “The analogy is unclear, as the record contains very little evidence of what actions of the Husband or Wife triggered the underlying tort.”
• “there is no indication that the [Court of Common Pleas] ever considered and ruled on the effect of the automatic stay arising from the Husband’s case.”
• “There is no evidence of fraudulent concealment of the bankruptcy of the Husband.”
• debt resulting from tort liability not a “consumer debt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).