In re Ivie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that EPA action 22 violated § 706(2)(A) because it ignored the agency’s regulatory definition of “facility”
• holding that EPA action 22 violated § 706(2)(A) because it ignored the agency’s regulatory definition of “facility”
• holding that EPA action 19 violated § 706(2)(A) because it ignored the agency’s regulatory definition of “facility”
• holding that EPA action 4 violated § 706(2)(A) because it ignored the agency’s regulatory definition of “facility”
• “There are key attributes of the EPA’s decision, however, that lead us to conclude that the EPA’s interpretation is not entitled to Auer deference and is at best entitled only to Skidmore deference.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).