Indiana Supreme Court· 6/28/2010

In Re ITT Derivative Litigation

Citations

932 N.E.2d 664
2010 Ind. LEXIS 401
2010 WL 2571875

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“explaining that the liability standard of subsection (e) responded to increasing amount of litigation against directors, the increasing expense of defending such claims, and the increasing cost of director and officer liability insurance”
\[W]e have looked to Delaware law when considering cases involving alleged breaches of fiduciary duties.\
“We interpret a statute in order to give effect to every word and render no part meaningless if it can be reconciled with the rest of the statute.”
“We interpret a statute in order to give effect to every word and render no part meaningless if it can be reconciled with the rest of the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Boehm, Rucker, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.