California Court of Appeal· 3/10/1992
In Re Issac J.
Citations
- 4 Cal. App. 4th 525
- 6 Cal. Rptr. 2d 65
- 92 Daily Journal DAR 3399
- 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2344
- 1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 315
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that in appropriate cases, there is a due process right to counsel in a termination of parental rights proceeding, and “[wjhere there is a due process right to counsel, there is a concomitant right to the effective assistance of counsel”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dabney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Kristin H.California Court of Appeal· 1996-07-01· cited 267×
- Stanislaus County Department of Social Services v. Noeline P.California Court of Appeal· 1997-07-29· cited 176×
- In Re Arturo A.California Court of Appeal· 1992-07-20· cited 87×
- In Re Darlice C.California Court of Appeal· 2003-01-16· cited 38×
- Neumann v. MelgarCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-07-30· cited 31×
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Ruth M.California Court of Appeal· 2001-07-06· cited 23×
- In Re Ricky H.California Court of Appeal· 1992-10-16· cited 21×
- People v. MorseCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1993-12-22· cited 17×
- Humboldt County Social Services Agency v. Charles H.California Court of Appeal· 1994-02-23· cited 16×
- Hector R. v. John Martin H.California Court of Appeal· 2003-01-08· cited 15×
- Duckson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-09-08· cited 8×
- Public Social Services v. Lisa H.California Court of Appeal· 1992-10-16· cited 4×
- San Diego County Department of Social Services v. Veronica A.California Court of Appeal· 1992-07-20· cited 1×
- Santa Clara County Department of Family & Children's Services v. Kimberly I.California Court of Appeal· 1996-07-01· cited 1×
- In re Z. S.California Court of Appeal· 2015-04-01
- In re Christopher L.California Court of Appeal· 2020-11-02
- In re Christopher L.California Court of Appeal· 2020-11-12
- In re Christopher L.California Court of Appeal· 2020-11-24
- In re A.R.California Supreme Court· 2021-04-05
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court· 1981-08-28· cited 3,458×
- Lehman Ex Rel. Lehman v. Lycoming County Children's Services AgencySupreme Court· 1982-06-30· cited 469×
- Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1975-12-10· cited 234×
- In Re Malinda S.California Supreme Court· 1990-09-06· cited 210×
- Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1950-05-09· cited 181×
- In Re BenoitCalifornia Supreme Court· 1973-09-24· cited 153×
- People v. SlobodionCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-06-24· cited 127×
- In Re Laura F.California Supreme Court· 1983-05-19· cited 109×
- In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-07-09· cited 108×
- Adoption of Alexander S.California Supreme Court· 1988-03-17· cited 96×
- In Re Jacqueline H.California Supreme Court· 1978-04-27· cited 54×
- In Re GonsalvesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-05-31· cited 39×
- S. Elise D. v. Steven D.California Court of Appeal· 1989-03-29· cited 31×
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-12-26· cited 28×
- In Re Ammanda G.California Court of Appeal· 1986-09-30· cited 23×
- MAURO B. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-05-28· cited 22×
- Roger B. v. Randall D.California Court of Appeal· 1989-04-10· cited 18×
- In Re Brendan P.California Court of Appeal· 1986-03-21· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.