Supreme Court of South Carolina· 11/3/2003
In Re Iseman
Citations
- 588 S.E.2d 606
- 356 S.C. 280
- 2003 S.C. LEXIS 266
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Supreme Court holds ultimate authority to sanction attorneys
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Moore, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Matter of YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-08-04· cited 17×
- In re WelchSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-07-28· cited 11×
- In re HoltSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-10-27· cited 5×
- In the Matter of IsemanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-11-17· cited 4×
- In re YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-12-18· cited 4×
- In re IsemanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-10-29· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.