In re Isaac Prager & Son

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the predominance requirement was satisfied despite individualized issues of consent
• denying defendant’s objection to the class definition where the court “agree[d] with plaintiff that the new definition is simply a narrower version of the class definition presented in the [operative complaint]”
• denying defendant’s objection to the class definition where the court “agree[d] with plaintiff that the new definition is simply a narrower version of the class definition presented in the [operative complaint]”
• typicality satisfied where, among other things, class and lead plaintiff were all called for the purpose of debt collection using ATDS systems

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).