In Re Introgen Therapeutics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “some intercompany accounts and commingling” is sufficient to support substantive consolidation since “it would not necessarily be easy to separate the accounting”
• rejecting absolute-priority objection because “[t]he only way Class 4 [equity] will receive anything is if Class 3 in fact gets paid in full”
• applying Augie/Restivo standard in evaluating substantive consolidation in debtors’ proposed chapter 11 plan
• Judge Gargotta did not view it as a balancing test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).