In Re, Intl Nutronics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a bankruptcy court’s order confirming a sale has preclusive effects”
• holding that non-core claims not raised in bankruptcy proceeding were barred by res judicata because they could have been asserted, which is enough for res judicata purposes, even if the bankruptcy court could not have rendered a final decision
• referring to an 1 Therefore, the Bankruptcy Court applied the correct legal standard and also 2 correctly concluded that all the elements are readily met, for these reasons: 3 First, there is an identity of claims given Mr. Baroni’s entire motion is 4 premised on the fact that his 363(i
• res judicata effect of sale order bars antitrust claims that infringe the same rights as the collusive bidding, and could have been asserted at the sale hearing
• antitrust claim against joint venture bidders could have been brought in pri- or bankruptcy proceeding, thus, claim was precluded in subsequent suit to avoid the sale
• the Ninth Circuit noting that a “bankruptcy court's 13 order confirming a sale has preclusive effects” and is a final judgment for purposes 14 of res judicata

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).