In re Interstate Paving Co.
Citations
- 197 F. 371
- 1912 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1427
Syllabus
<p>1. Municipal Corporations (§ 353*) — Public Improvement Contracts — Assignments — Filing—Necessity.</p> <p>Under New York Lien Law (Laws 1897. c. 418) § 15, as amended by Laws 1907, c. 360, effective May 23, 1907, which requires assignments of contracts for the improvement of real property to be filed with the county clerk, and under Act July 22, 1907 (Laws N. Y. 1907, c. 692), creating a new section of the lien law (section 15a), which requires assignments of contracts for public improvements to be filed with the head of the department having charge of the improvement, filing of assignments of the latter class with county clerks is not required.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Municipal Corporations, Cent. Dig. §, 885; Dec. Dig. § 353.*]</p> <p>2. Bankruptcy (§ 151*) — Trustee—Title to Property.</p> <p>A trustee in bankruptcy takes the property of the bankrupt, not as an innocent purchaser, but as the debtor had it at the time of the petition subject to all valid claims, liens, and equities.</p> <p>[Ed. Note.. — For other cases, see Bankruptcy, Cent. Dig. § 193; Dec. Dig. § 151.*]</p> <p>3. Municipal Corporations (§ 353*) — Public Improvement Contracts — Assignment — Failure to File — Effect.</p> <p>Failure to file an assignment of a municipal improvement contract, as required by New York Lien Law (Laws 1907, c. 692) § 15a, does not defeat the assignee’s right to the proceeds of warrants issued under the contract as against the contractor’s general creditors; the statute being for the benefit of the city and creditors having lienable claims.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Municipal Corporations, Cent. Dig. § 885; Dec.-Dig. § 353.*]</p>
Judges: Ray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Thompson v. FairbanksSupreme Court· 1905-02-20· cited 259×
- Sexton v. Kessler & Co.Supreme Court· 1912-05-27· cited 172×
- Armstrong v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1901-07-01· cited 9×
- Armstrong v. ChisolmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1904-07-01· cited 9×
- Asphalt Paving & Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1912-03-22· cited 3×
- Armstrong v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1901-11-15· cited 3×
- Tolkow v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court· 1911-09-15· cited 1×
- Armstrong v. ChisolmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1904-12-23· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.