In Re International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “phantom marks . . . encompass too many combinations and permutations to make a thorough and effective search possible.”
• the USPTO argued that the applications were written in sufficiently broad terms such that all of the potential variations of the marks covered by the “phantom” elements were not in use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).