In Re International Fibercom, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Rule 2004 does not contain any exception precluding discovery when it is available in other pending litigation and holding that courts have the ultimate discretion whether to permit the use of Rule 2004 to obtain discovery in contested matters
• “Consequently when the Rule 2004 examination relates not to the pending adversary litigation, but to another matter, the ‘pending proceeding’ rule does not apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).