In re Interest of Rome R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he admission of the evidence did not constitute prejudicial error requiring reversal. The Commonwealth’s case was overwhelmingly strong. . . . We think that the jury’s verdict was not affected by the [erroneously admitted] evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).