In Re Interest of Aaron D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that State failed to present testi- mony or other evidence from therapists, family support work- ers, foster parents, and others who directly observed parties
• reversing termination where mother had progressed on case plan despite continuing deficiencies in her employment, living situation, and visitation consistency
• parent’s interest in accuracy and justice of decision to terminate parental rights is commanding one
• section 43-292(7) operates mechanically and, unlike the other subsections of the statute, does not require the State to adduce evidence of any specific fault on the part of a parent
• termination of parental rights reversed; State used a DHHS worker as a proxy for all of the other witnesses whose expertise and testimony would have been helpful, and perhaps essential, in determining what was in the child’s best interests.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).