Skip to main content
· 11/18/1996

In Re Interactive Network, Inc. Securities Litigation

Citations

  • 948 F. Supp. 917
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 4646
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18065
  • 1996 WL 701024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the doctrine “is designed only to be a pleading device and not to be a hook on which to hang liability”
  • “The purpose of the doctrine is to relieve plaintiffs the burden of proving the authorship of a writing. This problem of authorship does not arise with oral statements.”
  • “The purpose of the doctrine is to relieve plaintiffs the burden of proving the authorship of a writing. This problem of authorship does not arise with oral statements.”
  • “The purpose of the doctrine is to relieve plaintiffs the burden of proving the authorship of a writing. This problem of authorship does not arise with oral statements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jensen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.