Skip to main content
· 4/5/2018

In re Intel Corp. CPU Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.

Citations

  • 291 F. Supp. 3d 1381

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the NJTCA includes “a mandatory pre-suit notification of claim”
  • noting that Tort Claims Act establishes procedures for bringing claims, which “include filing of a timely notice”
  • finding that purpose of 1994 amendment \was to raise the bar for the filing of a late notice\
  • \Our ruling in McKnight was rooted in notions of finality . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chair, Vance

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.