Skip to main content
· 2/24/2006

In Re Inquiry of a Judge Steed

Citations

  • 2006 UT 10
  • 131 P.3d 231
  • 546 Utah Adv. Rep. 27
  • 2006 Utah LEXIS 11
  • 2006 WL 437462

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The court removed the judge because his multiple marriages were contrary to law, holding “it is of little or no consequence that the judge may believe a criminal statute is constitutionally defective.”
  • The court removed the judge because his multiple marriages were contrary to law, holding “it is of little or no consequence that the judge may believe a criminal statute is constitutionally defective.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkins, Durrant, Parrish, Nehring, Wilkins', Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.