In re Incorporated Village of Garden City

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding plaintiffs’ allegations that defendant’s deceptive practices “caused them to pay artificially inflated prices for its products [sufficient for purposes of] staffing] a cause of action for unjust enrichment”
• re-jecting defendant’s argument that plaintiffs were not entitled to class action relief under § 349 based on fact that statutorily prescribed $50 minimum damages constitutes a “penalty” under C.P.L.R. 901(b)
• sustaining New York unjust enrichment claim brought by “indirect purchasers of Microsoft’s software products,” and rejecting holding that “plaintiffs only indirectly bestowed a benefit upon Microsoft”
• “[The] plaintiffs’ allegations that Microsoft’s deceptive practices caused them to pay artificially inflated prices for its products state a cause of action for unjust enrichment.”
• “[The] [p]laintiffs’ allegations that Microsoft’s deceptive practices caused them to pay artificially inflated prices for its products state a cause of action for unjust enrichment.”
• “[The] [p]laintiffs’ allegations that Microsoft’s deceptive practices caused them to pay artificially inflated prices for its products state a cause of action for unjust enrichment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).