In re Incomnet, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that the Ninth Circuit has explicitly adopted the dominion test set out in Bonded
• observing that the Bonded decision is \the leading case in this area\ and that \[t]he inquiry focuses on whether an entity had legal authority over the money and the right to use the money however it wished\ (emphasis added)
• applying the dominion test from Bonded and observing that the dominion and control tests \do differ\
• distinguishing between the “dominion” test of Bonded Financial, the “control” test applied by the 11th Circuit, and various hybrids
• characterizing Bonded Fin. Serv. as the “leading case in this area”
• “the fact that [the recipient] can only spend the [funds] in accordance with certain federal regulations does not necessarily mean it is not a transferee.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).