In Re Income Property Builders, Inc., Debtor. Armel Laminates, Inc. v. The Lomas & Nettleton Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an order dismissing a bankruptcy case was not the same as an order closing a bankruptcy case for the purposes of § 350(b)
• holding that a dismissed case is not a closed case and cannot be reopened
• explaining that once the bankruptcy was dismissed, the bankruptcy court could no longer order a stay
• explaining that once the bankruptcy was dismissed the bankruptcy court could no longer order a stay.
• denying as moot appeal of order lifting automatic stay because underlying bankruptcy case’s dismissal had become final
• “An order dismissing a bankruptcy case accomplishes a completely different result than an order closing it would and is not an order closing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).