S.D. Illinois· 9/10/2018
In re In re
Citations
- 339 F. Supp. 3d 185
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that New Orleans Terminal is responsible for processing and storage at the Terminal, whereas MSC is responsible for stowage aboard the vessel
- finding that special handling instructions must be received “further in advance of the cargo so that proper arrangements can be made”
- noting that “[p]roper and adequate performance” of BDP’s “document processing duties” was “implicit 5 in [its] agreement” with Stolt
- describing the conditions to which the DVB-80 was exposed as creating “ticking time bombs”
- “[There] is insufficient evidence that had that language been preserved, MSC here would have acted differently or had different legal responsibilities to do so.”
- “The Master Bill of Lading Instructions provided the following heat warning: ‘DO NOT STOW NEAR HEAT SOURCES. STOW ABOVE DECK FOR TEMPERATURE MONITORING.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Forrest
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-16· cited 1,227×
- Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court· 1995-02-22· cited 746×
- United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court· 1975-05-19· cited 702×
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.Supreme Court· 2004-11-09· cited 539×
- Diesel Props S.R.L. v. Greystone Business Credit II LLCSecond Circuit· 2011-01-06· cited 266×
- Cooper Stevedoring Co. v. Fritz Kopke, Inc.Supreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 263×
- Ingersoll Milling Machine Co. v. M/V BodenaSecond Circuit· 1987-09-14· cited 196×
- Metropolitan Coal Co. v. HowardSecond Circuit· 1946-06-05· cited 97×
- Wilma Williams v. Kfc National Management CompanySecond Circuit· 2004-12-09· cited 94×
- Williamson v. Recovery Ltd. PartnershipSecond Circuit· 2008-08-22· cited 92×
- Colgate Palmolive Co. v. S/S Dart CanadaSecond Circuit· 1983-12-14· cited 66×
- A/s J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi v. Commercial Stevedoring Co., Inc.Second Circuit· 1958-06-05· cited 62×
- Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance, PLC v. Ocean World Lines, Inc.Second Circuit· 2010-07-20· cited 42×
- Sun Company Inc. And Sun Oil Trading Company v. S.S. Overseas Arctic, Overseas Bulktank Corporation, and Bp Oil Shipping Co., U.S.A.Fifth Circuit· 1994-09-12· cited 39×
- Pearce v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 2001-08-23· cited 34×
- Starrag Starrag-Heckert Inc. v. Maersk, Inc., a New York Corporation Maersk Pacific Ltd., a California CorporationNinth Circuit· 2007-05-14· cited 32×
- Germain v. FicarraSecond Circuit· 2016-06-01· cited 31×
- Otal Investments Ltd. v. M/V ClarySecond Circuit· 2012-03-08· cited 28×
- Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Adelaide Shipping Lines, Ltd., Claimant-Appellee, and Salen Reefer Services Ab, and M/v GladiolaNinth Circuit· 1979-04-19· cited 27×
- Rice v. Pennsylvania R. Co. The William RSecond Circuit· 1953-03-20· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.