Skip to main content
S.D. Illinois· 9/10/2018

In re In re

Citations

  • 339 F. Supp. 3d 185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that New Orleans Terminal is responsible for processing and storage at the Terminal, whereas MSC is responsible for stowage aboard the vessel
  • finding that special handling instructions must be received “further in advance of the cargo so that proper arrangements can be made”
  • noting that “[p]roper and adequate performance” of BDP’s “document processing duties” was “implicit 5 in [its] agreement” with Stolt
  • describing the conditions to which the DVB-80 was exposed as creating “ticking time bombs”
  • “[There] is insufficient evidence that had that language been preserved, MSC here would have acted differently or had different legal responsibilities to do so.”
  • “The Master Bill of Lading Instructions provided the following heat warning: ‘DO NOT STOW NEAR HEAT SOURCES. STOW ABOVE DECK FOR TEMPERATURE MONITORING.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Forrest

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.