· 4/28/1978
In Re In-Progress Trace of a Wire Communication
Citations
- 386 A.2d 1295
- 76 N.J. 255
- 1978 N.J. LEXIS 170
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an in-progress trace of incoming phone calls violated the Wiretap Act
- holding that an in-progress trace of incoming phone calls violated the Wiretap Act
- wiretap statutes, implicating individual rights of privacy, are to be strictly construed to limit potential invasion
- “Wiretap statutes implicating as they do an intrusion into individual rights of privacy, constitutionally and legislatively recognized, should generally be strictly construed”
- provisions in amendment of wiretap statute addressed specific objections made by the telephone company
- describing mechanics of a pen register
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schreiber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.