In re I.L.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1674
Syllabus
Parental rights permanent custody manifest weight of the evidence R.C. 2151.353 R.C. 2151.413 R.C. 2151.414 clear and convincing evidence best interest of the child. The record contains clear and convincing evidence to support the trial court's finding that I.L. was in the agency's custody for 12 months or longer for a consecutive 22-month period pursuant to R.C. 2151.414(B)(1)(d), and it was in the best interest of the child to grant permanent custody to the agency. The juvenile court's grant of permanent custody of the child to the agency was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-18· cited 599×
- In re SchaeferOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-25· cited 400×
- In re K.H.Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-09-30· cited 255×
- In re N.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-29· cited 142×
- In re L.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-23· cited 80×
- In re C.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2010-03-04· cited 53×
- In re L.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-11· cited 30×
- In re R.G.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-21· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.