In re Ida Christina L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that ‘‘[a] statute is ambiguous if, when read in context, [it] is susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• reciting facts that trial court reasonably could have found on basis of evidence presented at trial
• in construing statutes, ‘‘[w]e are not permitted to supply statutory language that the legislature may have chosen to omit’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• in construing statutes, ‘‘[w]e are not permitted to supply statutory language that the legislature may have chosen to omit’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).