In re: I.B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no requirement for an independent review but exercising discretion to review no-merit brief and affirming trial court's termination of parental rights order
• detailing \settled rules of interpretation [that] support a conclusion that we are not required to conduct an independent review of the record under the text of Rule 3.1(d) as it is written\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re L.E.M.
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2019-08-16· cited 101×
• In re S.S.S.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-03-05
• In re M.R.C-M.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-03-19
• In re T.M.L.E.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-04-02
• In re: K.E.P.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2025-04-16

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• Polk County v. Dodson
  Supreme Court· 1981-12-14· cited 4,924×
• McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,718×
• Wilkie v. City of Boiling Spring Lakes
  Supreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-03-02· cited 49×
• Comstock v. Comstock
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2015-11-17· cited 11×
• Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Am. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-11-01· cited 11×
• Davis v. Craven Cty. ABC Bd.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-04-17· cited 6×