In Re Hunter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The purpose of sanctions is not “to punish attorneys, but rather to protect the public from harm and to maintain confidence in our legal institutions by deterring future misconduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Melvin Fink
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-04-15· cited 16×
• In re William J. McCarty, Jr.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2013-06-28· cited 12×
• In Re Appeal of Houston
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2006-06-28· cited 12×
• In re Christena Obregon, Esq.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2016-03-11· cited 5×
• In re Richard Bowen, Esq.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2021-02-12· cited 5×
• In re Phyllis McCoy Jacien, Esq.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2018-03-29· cited 3×
• In re Keitel
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2001-03-02· cited 3×
• In re PRB Docket No. 2014.133
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2015-04-09· cited 3×
• In Re Hunter
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-12-28· cited 2×
• In re PRB No. 2013-145
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2017-01-25· cited 1×
• Weinstein v. Harmon
  Vermont Superior Court· 2013-09-26
• In re PRB No. 2018-087
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2019-01-18
• In re PRB Docket No. 2016-042
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2016-08-24