Michigan Court of Appeals· 3/18/1985
In Re Humphrey Estate
Citations
- 367 N.W.2d 873
- 141 Mich. App. 412
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the use of term “may” signifies permissive language
- stating that the use of term “may” signifies permissive language
- “the parties need only be substantially identical in order for res judicata to apply; that is, it applies to the same parties or their privies.” Id. (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Danhof, C.J., and T.M. Burns and R.H. Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Peterson Novelties, Inc v. City of BerkleyMichigan Court of Appeals· 2003-12-11· cited 294×
- In Re Green Charitable TrustMichigan Court of Appeals· 1988-10-17· cited 35×
- In Re Estate of HammondMichigan Court of Appeals· 1996-04-29· cited 27×
- In Re Adams EstateMichigan Court of Appeals· 2003-08-20· cited 26×
- In Re Sloan EstateMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-07-25· cited 22×
- In Re MartinMichigan Court of Appeals· 1993-07-19· cited 20×
- Hart v. Comerica BankE.D. Michigan· 1997-02-24· cited 18×
- Jarmin v. Shriners Hospitals for Crippled ChildrenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-01-18· cited 15×
- Noble v. McNerneyMichigan Court of Appeals· 1988-01-19· cited 12×
- Whitman v. City of BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals· 2011-07-05· cited 9×
- In Re Irwin EstateMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-05-27· cited 7×
- In Re Sumpter EstateMichigan Court of Appeals· 1988-02-01· cited 7×
- In Re Prichard EstateMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-08-19· cited 6×
- Smith v. ConsengcoMichigan Court of Appeals· 1985-10-09· cited 5×
- In Re Finlay EstateMichigan Court of Appeals· 1986-09-08· cited 4×
- Smith v. AmeritechE.D. Michigan· 2000-03-03· cited 4×
- Mason v. CampbellMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-05-27· cited 1×
- In re the Estate of BuggsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 1998-10-29
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Braxton v. LitchalkMichigan Court of Appeals· 1974-10-07· cited 51×
- Robinson v. Emmet County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals· 1976-12-09· cited 21×
- In Re Brack EstateMichigan Court of Appeals· 1982-12-06· cited 20×
- In Re L'Esperance EstateMichigan Court of Appeals· 1984-01-17· cited 16×
- In Re Kiebler EstateMichigan Court of Appeals· 1984-01-03· cited 12×
- In Re Estate of WeaverMichigan Court of Appeals· 1982-09-23· cited 11×
- Breen v. KehoeMichigan Supreme Court· 1905-11-21· cited 10×
- In Re Easterbrook EstateMichigan Court of Appeals· 1982-04-06· cited 7×
- In Re Humphrey EstateMichigan Court of Appeals· 1981-07-13· cited 5×
- Green v. Old Kent Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1966-07-12· cited 4×
- In Re Cunningham EstateMichigan Court of Appeals· 1983-12-20· cited 3×
- Humphrey v. Detroit Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1985-03-18· cited 2×
Other cases named In Re Humphrey Estate
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.