Customs and Patent Appeals· 2/21/1957
In re Hummer
Citations
- 44 C.C.P.A. 814
- 241 F.2d 742
- 113 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 66
- 1957 CCPA LEXIS 211
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “applicant seeks a patent on only a narrow improvement. Progress is as important, however, in crowded arts as well as in those which are in the pioneer stage”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Because, Cole, Connell, Hearing, Illness, Jackson, Johnson, Place, Recalled, Rich, Who, Worley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Tokai Corp. v. Easton Enterprises, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2011-01-31· cited 102×
- In re CitronCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1958-01-22· cited 8×
- In re MengCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1974-03-07· cited 8×
- In re DevineCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1958-12-01· cited 5×
- Application of Hubert C. Wynne and Frank CousenCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1958-06-18· cited 3×
- Application of Norman A. Altmann and William H. BureauCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1959-04-22· cited 3×
- Application of Wallace A. Shelby, JrCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1963-01-16· cited 2×
- Matter of the Application of Joseph H. HornsteinCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1957-06-04
- Application of James H. DevineCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1958-12-01
- In re HornsteinCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1957-06-04
- In re WynneCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1958-06-18
- In re MixonCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1973-01-18
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named In re Hummer
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.