In re Humble Oil & Refining Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an expert in electrical engineering’s opinions on the commercial success of patented inventions were inadmissible because the expert lacked expertise on the “factors influenc[ing] the commercial success of the [patented] products”
• excluding expert report that did not “apply a reliable methodology to reach a helpful conclusion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).