In Re: Humberto Castrejon Alvarez v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting Von Bergren received a rehearing on an amended specification and the court did not view the issue as one of jurisdiction, but rather whether a new Article 32, UCMJ, hearing should have been granted
• see also United States v. Siroky, 44 M.J. 394, 398 n.1 (C.A.A.F. 1996)
• “‘[T]he effect of ordering a rehearing is ... to place the United States and the accused in the same position as they were at the beginning of the original trial.’” (alteration in original) (quoting United States v. Staten, 21 C.M.A. 493, 495, 45 C.M.R. 267, 269 (1972)
• “‘[T]he effect of ordering a rehearing is ... to place the United States and the accused in the same position as they were at the beginning of the original trial.’” (alteration in original) (quoting United States v. Staten, 21 C.M.A. 493, 495, 45 C.M.R. 267, 269 (1972)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).