Skip to main content
D. Kansas· 2/23/2011

In Re Howley

Citations

  • 446 B.R. 506
  • 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 643
  • 2011 WL 721541

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a right to future per capita payments to a tribal member from Indian gaming was properly part of the bankruptcy estate and discussing several other interests properly part of a bankruptcy estate: (1
  • declining to follow Fess because the relevant “Tribal Ordinance does not have provisions similar to those of the Ho-Chunk Nation Code which controlled the outcome in Fess”
  • applying state law and the fact that “The Ordinance has no provision stating that the funds to be used for payments retain their character as property of the tribe until actually disbursed” in finding the right to payment was property of the estate
  • for purposes of § 541, courts analyze property interests under state law, since “Congress has generally left the determination of property rights in assets of a bankrupt’s estate to state law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dale L. Somers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.