In re Howell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that nondischargeable student loans that resulted in only $40 of monthly disposable income constituted a special circumstance sufficient to rebut the presumption of abuse
• noting that “after completing any likely plan under Chapter 13, the debtors would owe more on their student loans than if they had continued to make their regular contractual payments during the same period of time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re: Robert N. Kornfield and Karen E. Kornfield, Debtors. Robert N. Kornfield and Karen E. Kornfield v. Carolyn S. Schwartz, United States Trustee
  Second Circuit· 1999-01-07· cited 41×
• In Re Haman
  D. Delaware· 2007-04-20· cited 41×
• In Re Knight
  N.D. Georgia· 2007-06-27· cited 27×
• In Re Delbecq
  S.D. Indiana· 2007-04-26· cited 26×
• In Re Templeton
  W.D. Oklahoma· 2007-03-08· cited 23×
• In Re Martin
  C.D. Illinois· 2007-07-16· cited 20×
• In Re Pageau
  D. New Hampshire· 2008-02-21· cited 17×
• In Re Champagne
  D. Kansas· 2008-04-04· cited 11×
• In Re Harmon
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-02-16· cited 9×
• In Re Carrillo
  D. Arizona· 2009-11-25· cited 8×
• In Re Burggraf
  N.D. Ohio· 2010-08-09· cited 4×
• In Re Sanders
  M.D. Alabama· 2011-07-12· cited 2×