In re Hollywood Bond & Mortgage Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the agency’s explanation that a comment was “beyond the scope of the rulemaking” was an “adequate” explanation of its decision
• suggesting that agencies are not required to address comments outside the scope of the rulemaking as long as they do not cast doubt on the reasonableness of the agency’s position
• explaining that the requirement to respond is not “particularly demanding”
• substantive response to comment not required where comments are “beyond the scope of the rulemaking”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).