In Re Hogan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a lawyer lacked a fundamental skill when he filed nineteen pleadings or briefs containing incomprehensible arguments and writing
• attorney’s inability to draft comprehensible briefs, which does not involve corrupt motive or moral turpitude, warrants placement on inactive status during period of rehabilitation until competence to engage in practice of law is demonstrated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Howard
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1999-12-02· cited 17×
• In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Rosellini
  Washington Supreme Court· 1987-07-02· cited 12×
• In re Jordan
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1993-11-18· cited 2×
• In Re Shepperson
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1996-01-24· cited 1×
• People v. Bontrager
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2017-04-20· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Taylor
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-05-20· cited 57×
• In Re Levin
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1979-09-19· cited 39×
• In Re Driscoll
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 31×
• In Re Snitoff
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-09-20· cited 21×